When considering total utility in this situation, personal target of CEO is not as important as the treatment for kidney patients as health is one of the greatest assets. It morally wrong to gain advantages from a non-profit organization that started with the aim of helping kidney patients.
The conventional approach holds that individuals should compare their decisions or actions against the norms of acceptability in his society before reaching a decision. It assumes that individuals form judgments about the propriety of rewards allocations based upon social comparisons across individuals.
Patients are supposedly the sole benefiters in the situation since the NKF is set up to help them. Lastly, there is uncertainty based on the theory of distributive justice.
We will write a custom essay sample on Ethical Analysis or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not Waste HIRE WRITER The lack of transparency of how the raised funds are distributed in the organisation to help the patients and the lack of intervention of the government resulted in such perquisite taking actions.
Uncertainties There are three major uncertainties in this situation.
Yet, they may not receive as much benefits as they are promised because the organization tends to focus on the administrative and marketing sectors as well as the fact that CEO is involved in perquisite taking.
However, kidney patients who need more subsidies for the kidney treatment benefit less since more money was channelled to other areas and thus they suffered negative utility.
He was involved in perquisite taking as shown by the golden toilet and financial discrepancies in the account.
Firstly, there is a the question of whether donors should completely rely on the series of mass media initiatives ranging from its popular live TV variety shows, television dramas and community outreach programmes.
Ethical lapses undermine the trust the public holds in the entire organization. If not, it would be deemed unethical. In this context, when Durai markets the non-profit organization to the public, it is easier to persuade the public to make their donations, leading to higher funds raised and generating positive utility.
Donors want to make sure that their donations are spent on the right areas, especially those with low incomes.
Although these initiatives enabled the NKF brand to spread deep into the suburban heartlands of Singapore, ultimately the donors should make sure they fully understand how the funds are distributed to help the kidney patients before making their donations.
Conversely, if a Ethical analysis nkf of the charities do so, the conventional approach would deem the action unethical. Deontological Ethics states that a decision or action is only deemed ethical if it conforms to moral principles. Hence, negative utility outweighs positive utility generated, thus from the utilitarian perspective, such actions are unethical.
Theoretical Perspectives The principle of utilitarianism is a moral principle that holds that the morally right course of action in any situation is the one that produces the greatest balance of benefits over harms for everyone affected.
In this context, different individuals in the organization has different responsibilities, but since there is no basis of comparison, money and reward are not meted out properly and thus issues of distributive justice arise. As such, the ethical issue present is that misuse of raised funds. While donors make donations to the NKF organization, they may derive other benefits from their contributions such as tax-deductible donations, self-satisfaction, publications and enhance reputation.
In this case, the degree of marketing NKF as a product to earn highest possible revenue should be compare to that of the other non-profit organizations in Singapore.
In this context, the CEO is morally unethical since he worked based on his self-interest instead of that of the kidney patients. Secondly, it is uncertain to what extent it is a common practice across most of the major non-profit organizations in Singapore to market their organization aggressively though media and all the possible channels.Analysing Ethical Issues of National Kidney Foundation; Analysing Ethical Issues of National Kidney Foundation Essay.
Words Nov 22nd, 5 Pages. Show More. Case Ethical Analysis: National Kidney Foundation of Singapore (A) – Anatomy of a Crisis Wee Beng Geok and Yvonne Chong. Free Essay: Oct ‘10 Nanyang Technological University[Type the company address] Yi Theng Lim Organization Behavior & Design Case Ethical Analysis NKF.
Ethical Analysis Nkf Essay Ethical Issue Based on this case study, the ethically dubious behaviour exhibited by the NKF is that the fund-raising strategies and tactics were too aggressive and the organization is not fiscally responsible.
Below we discuss the ethics of presumed consent, routine salvaging, and the Subcommittee's proposed policy alternative, "required response." Presumed Consent: Previous UNOS Research and Analysis Presumed consent, as one of several contending reform policies, has been considered previously by other UNOS committees and members.
Case Ethical Analysis: National Kidney Foundation of Singapore (A) – Anatomy of a Crisis Wee Beng Geok and Yvonne Chong Overview When the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) of Singapore came under the scrutiny of the nation back in the July ofit was evident that there was going to be major changes in the local social welfare scene.
Ethical Issue Based on this case study, the ethically dubious behaviour exhibited by the NKF is that the fund-raising strategies and tactics were too aggressive and the organization is not fiscally responsible.
These marketing practices distort and demean the aim of a charity organization and give the public the perception that it is all for [ ].Download